01
Kleinfeldt v. Crossroads Repair
D. North Dakota
Independent investigation of party structure, fault allocation, corporate relationships, and vehicle-identification evidence.
Trucking · Negligence · Fault Allocation
2026
View
Index
Cases
I independently examine active plaintiff-side cases from an adversarial perspective—looking for factual gaps, legal vulnerabilities, evidentiary problems, overlooked connections, emerging defenses, and assumptions that may fail under pressure. The objective is not simply to criticize the case, but to identify what can still be investigated, developed, corrected, or reinforced.
I publish these analyses here partly to demonstrate how I investigate, research, reason, and write, but also because the exercise itself makes me better at each of those things. Every case requires me to enter a different factual and legal landscape, learn unfamiliar industries and regulatory schemes, work through evolving statutes and precedent, test competing theories, and follow facts wherever they lead. It forces me to stay current, challenge my own assumptions, and continually sharpen the investigative, analytical, and writing skills that good litigation demands.
02
Minnesota v. TikTok
MN Hennepin
Large-docket synthesis and defense modeling designed to preserve the Court’s winning framing through discovery and proof.
Consumer Protection · Technology · Large Docket
2026
View
03
Tan v. City of San Jose
N.D. California
Defense-motion reconstruction and opposition strategy for a citywide automatic license plate reader challenge.
Fourth Amendment · ALPR · Motion Practice
2026
View
04
EPIC v. Mullin
S.D. California
Government policy reconstruction and related-case evidence discipline before the first dispositive motion.
APA · Privacy Act · First Amendment
2026
View
05
Devoir v. Star Fleet
D. Colorado
Defense forecasting from Answer admissions, Champion Homes ownership leverage, and a scheduling-order date matrix that would injure Plaintiff if left uncorrected.
Trucking · Comparative Fault · Corporate Structure
2026
View
06
Huddleston v. Caesars
D. Nevada
The official 2026 AG notices and May 19 consumer letter exist. The operative complaint does not use them—and that is the standing trap.
Data Breach · Standing · Class Action
2026
View
07
Hardesty v. Fenix
C.D. Cal.
The word “LIFETIME” is in the marketing copy, not the Terms. Resting Count I on TOS § 15 while discarding § 18 repeats a motion this defendant has already won.
Class Action · Forum Selection · Contract
2026
View